Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| 
| Lars> Even if this inset would seemingly make things easier I do not
| Lars> quite agree with it. IMO the bindings are not athorative, the
| Lars> lyxfuns are. So the bindings can be referenced in the main text,
| Lars> but the main focus should be on lfuns, the excact up to date
| Lars> bindings should go in an appendix.
| 
| Your are not telling us that the menu entries should be in appendix
| too, are you?

Sure menus are for _loosers_!

The only correct way of gettinging something done is to write small
scriptes that pipes commands to the lyx-server!

| However, I agree about the key bindings in main docs
| (especially now that they are visible in menus). However, having the
| key bindings and menu entries in reference.lyx would be great, and
| some automated scheme is the best way to keep them up to date.

yes.

-- 
        Lgb

Reply via email to