On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 01:50:27PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 10:31:45PM +0000, José Matos wrote: > > > > It seems there are two questions: > > > > > > > > (1) Are we still concerned about a security issue? > > > > (2) Regardless of a security issue, is xdg-open what we want? > > > > I pushed against xdg-open long time ago when debian maintainers offered it. > > The issue was not security, but the fact that the fallback handlers did not > > work well outside the debian framework (essentially firefox started to be > > launched as a default pdf viewer on my system). > > > > I migrated to debian years back, so I have no clue how it fares nowadays > > elsewhere... > > Good to know. Do I understand correctly then that you would not oppose > having it on the end of the options in the configure lists?
Well, no, but I guess that xdg people would say that it makes sense only in case you put it first. In any case I can't check outside debian sphere now so I will refrain from interfering in either direction. Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
