On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 10:31:45PM +0000, José Matos wrote: > > > It seems there are two questions: > > > > > > (1) Are we still concerned about a security issue? > > > (2) Regardless of a security issue, is xdg-open what we want? > > I pushed against xdg-open long time ago when debian maintainers offered it. > The issue was not security, but the fact that the fallback handlers did not > work well outside the debian framework (essentially firefox started to be > launched as a default pdf viewer on my system). > > I migrated to debian years back, so I have no clue how it fares nowadays > elsewhere...
Good to know. Do I understand correctly then that you would not oppose having it on the end of the options in the configure lists? Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
