On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 02:30:26PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > and/or in the context menu when right-clicking on a branch? > > > > > > The attached patch solves the problem for me. > > > I would like to get at least the lfun to the master (I can add note about > > > this > > > lfun for binding to tutorial). Objections? > > > > I find "selected branch" confusing in the documentation. It makes it > > seem we should select the branch and then run the LFUN. Should we say > > explicitly "the branch in front of the cursor" ? I didn't look at > > similar functions so perhaps "selected x" is indeed consistent with > > others. If so, please ignore. > > I do not have any strong opinion about the wording. > Could you update the patch so the wording is understandable? I am not good > at UI-friendly designs :)
Yes I can do that after we figure out the functionality. > > > If you like I can add the entry to the context menu of branch inset (part > > > of the > > > current patch), but I am equivalently happy to have in just in my private > > > patchset. > > > > Perhaps ask on lyx-users? I find it strange to *toggle*. Why do you want > > to toggle rather than just "open all" or "close all" ? Can you describe > > a specific use case to toggle rather than open all or close all? Perhaps > > you are trying to be considerate of not taking up too many options? > > Exactly, I wanted to avoid unnecesary menu items. If it was single inset > one of the open/close items could be hidden, but not with many items... > And again no strong opinions here; since no one objected during last 6 years > it's probably only my issue and I am happy not to touch UI in master > if lfun is made available for keybinding. I propose to either add both "Open All" and "Close All" as long as we get a +1 on lyx-users. I think those two options are intuitive in the context menu. Although I understand the idea to try to compress two options into one "toggle", I do not think the toggle option is intuitive. If you agree with this proposal, I can ask on lyx-users. If you disagree, let's continue discussion and hopefully someone else has an opinion. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
