Le 28 décembre 2020 19:04:35 GMT+01:00, "Jürgen Spitzmüller" <sp...@lyx.org> a
écrit :
>Am Montag, dem 28.12.2020 um 19:00 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>> But this position gets weaker as we do not seem to get closer to the
>> actual release, I know.
>
>This is what we should really aim at, actually (independent of the qt
>question).
>
>Also, I seemed to remember that there was reluctance pulling too much
>Qt into the core (though I can't remember the details and whether this
>position still holds).
>
>Jürgen
>
Could it be that this is why boost::regex was useful after all? Did we rush too
fast in our joy of getting rid of it?
I do not think that solving issues with crappy compilers involves going all the
way in Qt's arms. Qt does have its flaws and bugs, and besides banging our head
against the walls, there is not much we can do to cure it. Qt does not follow a
standard, it is just Qt. Is it supposed to clear the screen before calling
paintEvent? Nobody knows. Does it tell you when the system keyboard is
switched? Your guess is as good as mine.
This is where relying on standards is good. There is correct behavior and
incorrect behavior. How do we find a good std::regex implementation for
windows? Is there a compiler version that works? Is there an alternative std
c++ library we can use? These are better questions than running towards an
hypothetical saviour.
I'm rambling, looks like it is time to go to bed.
JMarc
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
