On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 11:04:39PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 11:34:50PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 07:02:39PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 12:43:35PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > > > > And if this is OK, I should do the same for iint, iiint and iiiint, > > > > right? > > > > > > Yes, this fixes it, but also reveals another problem. If a macro appears > > > in the expansion of a \def, its requirements are also taken into account. > > > This is wrong, because the \def is only meant for on-screen representation > > > and not for output. So, the correct patch would be fixing this glitch. > > > This time you incurred in it, but I bet it will bite again. > > > > The attached patch works for me. > > Scott, does it work for you?
Yes, with the patch the esint package is not loaded. I only applied your patch and not the other patch in this thread. Let me know if I was supposed to test with both. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
