On 8/10/20 6:00 AM, Daniel wrote: > On 2020-08-09 18:56, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >> On 8/9/20 7:41 AM, Daniel wrote: >>> On 2020-08-08 19:45, Daniel wrote: >>>> Is there a reason that the font size for the Part layout is not >>>> greater than that for the Chapter (Book) or Section (Article) layout? >>>> There is a difference in size in both standard classes and KOMA >>>> script classes. I know LyX is not WYSIWYG but shouldn't there be some >>>> distinction in size anyway? >>> >>> I was wrong. >>> >>> The standard book layout might be fine. They fit the LaTeX output size >>> and are formatted as centered which makes them distinguishable. It >>> might be still be worth to format them in LyX with slightly larger >>> font size. But I guess that is optional. >>> >>> The article sizes are definitely wrong. For example, the part* and >>> section* cannot be visually distinguished at all, see the attached >>> document. Since the article classes are based on the book classes, I >>> guess this was just a mistake when tweaking them. >>> >>> The KOMA book classes actually use a slightly greater size for parts >>> which I would recommend adopting. >>> >>> I could make a patch if that's desired. >> >> Sure, go ahead. > > Two patches attached. > > article_sizes.diff: conservative in that it only corrects the > article's part font sizes, so that starred parts can be distinguished > visually from starred chapters in the work area. > > sectioning_sizes.diff: more reversionary in that it matches font sizes > with their LaTeX equivalents. > > Which is the better patch depends on what the reason for a difference > to LaTeX was. I am not sure what that reason might have been. Use less > space in the work area for headers?
Probably. I'll commit the former. Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
