On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 at 12:03, Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 04:16:11AM +0200, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > > Is agu_stdclass.inc worth keeping, by the way? It really looks like AGU > > used to use a DocBook variant, but that was a while ago: I can't find > > anything related to DocBook or XML on their website, they are only using > > Word and LaTeX nowadays ( > > https://www.agu.org/Publish-with-AGU/Publish/#1).The only references I > can > > find are back from 2003 ( > > > http://www.disciplineoforganizing.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Schwarzman-XML-CentricWorkflow.pdf > ) > > or 2006 ( > > > https://www.slideshare.net/aschwarzman/developing-an-stm-dtdschema-strategic-design-choices > ). > > It also looks like AGU switched to JATS in 2010 ( > > https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK47084/). > > Removing it is by no way required, as it should still work, but obviously > > not as well as before: I don't know what AGU DTD looked like, it was > > probably based on DocBook 3, while the main code supports only DocBook > 5. I > > guess the output no longer makes sense. > > I don't think that agu_stdclass.inc is worth keeping, lyx docbook output > is >10 years > obsolete and as you write agu.org swicthed from it at least one decade > back. > > > > > > According to lyx2lyx/lyx_2_0.py, > > > > > it really looks like this parameter is only useful for LyX > documents. > > > > > > > > I have no clue what line you talk about here. P > > > > That script introduces OutputFormat in LyX documents > (revert_outputformat). > > Thus, I suppose that this parameter is allowed in LyX documents > (otherwise, > > there would be nothing to remove it). > > No, that's misunderstanding, the name of the routine is cheating little > bit. > revert_outputformat removes newly introduced "default_output_format" > string in > .lyx header, not "outputformat". That's the Document > Settings > Formats > > Output Format > Default output format option we talked in the beginning of > this > thread, which still exists and we'll need to figure out later why docbook > is > not listed there. > > So if this was the only reason left, I believe we should go for patch 0004 > minus the format thing, if you agree. >
So, here is the new (final?) version of that patch. I also include another patch for AGU, which can be merged at any time, now. Thanks for your commitment :)!
0004-Add-required-elements-in-the-layouts-to-support-DocB.patch
Description: Binary data
0013-Remove-AGU-DTD-style-probably-doesn-t-work-impossibl.patch
Description: Binary data
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
