On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 at 23:56, Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 11:51:01PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 06:59:34PM +0200, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > > > On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 at 08:27, Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> wrote: > > > > Ok, that confirms my findings. I believe OutputFormat can be used in > > > > layouts but never in .lyx file, thus it does not make sense to > increase > > > > fileformat in order to delete it. Do we agree on this point or am I > missing > > > > some reason why you want to have that lyx2lyx conversion routine? > > > > > > > > > > I've yet to see a layout using this either. > > > > git grep OutputType | grep -E 'docbook|literate' > > I realized you are likely not having linux shell, so here you go: > > lib/layouts/agu_stdclass.inc:OutputType docbook > lib/layouts/db_stdclass.inc:OutputType docbook > lib/layouts/knitr.module:OutputType literate > lib/layouts/noweb.module:OutputType literate > lib/layouts/sweave.module:OutputType literate
Indeed, I don't have a Unix shell available, but GUI tools can still do the job. I did not find those because I was too restrictive on the extension… Is agu_stdclass.inc worth keeping, by the way? It really looks like AGU used to use a DocBook variant, but that was a while ago: I can't find anything related to DocBook or XML on their website, they are only using Word and LaTeX nowadays ( https://www.agu.org/Publish-with-AGU/Publish/#1).The only references I can find are back from 2003 ( http://www.disciplineoforganizing.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Schwarzman-XML-CentricWorkflow.pdf) or 2006 ( https://www.slideshare.net/aschwarzman/developing-an-stm-dtdschema-strategic-design-choices). It also looks like AGU switched to JATS in 2010 ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK47084/). Removing it is by no way required, as it should still work, but obviously not as well as before: I don't know what AGU DTD looked like, it was probably based on DocBook 3, while the main code supports only DocBook 5. I guess the output no longer makes sense. db_stdclass.inc is gone in a later commit, as implementing a compatibility layer for the existing DocBook support does not require it (it's done in one of the last commits). > > > According to lyx2lyx/lyx_2_0.py, > > > it really looks like this parameter is only useful for LyX documents. > > > > I have no clue what line you talk about here. P > That script introduces OutputFormat in LyX documents (revert_outputformat). Thus, I suppose that this parameter is allowed in LyX documents (otherwise, there would be nothing to remove it).
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
