On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 07:58:46AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 14. Juli 2019, 01:17:57 CEST schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> > Le 14/07/2019 à 00:15, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > > Am Samstag, 13. Juli 2019, 23:13:50 CEST schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> > >> Le 13/07/2019 à 23:01, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > >>> At least the message should be easy identifiable as error, so that
> > >>> we can parse it while testing layouts.
> > >>
> > >> Can you tell me more about how this works? I did not try the cmake side
> > >> of things. From what I read, you parse the stderr output and assume an
> > >> error if the string Error appears.
> > >
> > > That is the problem ... the process ends without error.
> > > But we could parse the output and fake an error for the test-run.
> > >
> > >> What would be the place of a Warning in this setting?
> > >
> > > It would serve as a string to be parsed by the test-machinery.
> > > (The parsing is not there yet, but is not difficult to create)
> >
> > In check_layout.cmake, I see this:
> >
> > if (_err MATCHES "Error reading")
> > message(STATUS "_err = \"${_err}\"")
> > message(FATAL_ERROR "Errors found")
> > endif()
> >
> > Isn't this some kind of parsing?
> >
> > JMarc
>
> Yes, exactly.Is there anything left to be done for this? Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
