>Subject: Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support > > >Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It seems to me that at the time SMiyata submitted it more for comments >> than actual inclusion. Anyway, I think we really need something like >> that. > >Yes, but one of the reason was that I cannot test the code on systems >other than OS/2. > >> - pay attention to the case of file names. I saw both #include >> "support/OS.h" and #include "support/os.h". I'd rather not have full >> caps names like OS_UNIX.C > >Sorry, it was my fault. >Since I cannot compile LyX any more here, I would like Windows developers >to submit the final patch. I'll try to come up with something fancier in a few days. --Ruurd > >Regards, > SMiyata
- [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support Ruurd A. Reitsma
- Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 ... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Wi... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Wi... Miyata Shigeru
- Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 &... Ruurd A. Reitsma
- Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 &... Miyata Shigeru
- Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 ... Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
- [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 ... Ruurd A. Reitsma
- Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 &... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- RE: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 ... Ruurd A. Reitsma
- Re: [PATCH] os class for ... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: [PATCH] os class ... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: [PATCH] os class for ... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- RE: [PATCH] os class ... Ruurd A. Reitsma
- Re: [PATCH] os cl... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes