Hello!
Quoting r. Kalle Dalheimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Re: New Arrival":
> >
> > > One of the problems is that the STL version shipped with MS Visual C++ is
> > > severely broken.
> >
> > This would not be a problem in this case (Btw the g++ lib is broken as
> > well...)
>
> Yes. In my experience, the only non-broken STL implementation on Linux is the
> one in KCC.
In Intel we are using STLport for development
on Linux (g++), HP (aCC) and Windows (VC++) quite successfully.
http://stlport.org/
STLport is free as in speech, it has a license similiar to LGPL.
It has high degree of ANSI compatibility (even working around bugs
in compilers to resent to the user ANSI interface) and very good
performance.
It also has some nice features like debug mode, and compatibility
macros which allows mixing STLport with built-in STL in compiler
(important for e.g. QT port).
Also, if you find bugs, you can always fix them :)
Regards,
MSt
--
This message content is not part of Intel's views or affairs
Michael S. Tsirkin
> Four things are to be strengthened: Torah,and good deeds,
> prayer and one's good manners (Berachoth)