On Tuesday, 13. March 2001 13:18, you wrote:
> > The world is not perfect, however, there all kinds of compiler
> > incompatibilities, system library bugs, etc., but still porting a Qt/Unix
> > version to Qt/Windows should be considerably less work than porting to
> > pure Win32 or to MFC. Remember that the compiler incompatibilities,
> > system library bugs, etc. hit you no matter which toolkit you use.
>
> If we can compile it with g++ under *nix, we should _in theory_ be able to
> use it (cygwin) under Windows or even cross-compile the whole thing with
> mingw32...
Yes, _in theory_. Whenever I tried to use cygwin, I ran into so many problems
that I gave up sooner or later. That does not mean, of course, that somebody
with more patience can do it.
>
> > One of the problems is that the STL version shipped with MS Visual C++ is
> > severely broken.
>
> This would not be a problem in this case (Btw the g++ lib is broken as
> well...)
Yes. In my experience, the only non-broken STL implementation on Linux is the
one in KCC.
> What is the current status of the Qt port anyway?
I haven't had much time lately to do anything on it, but Edwin is making some
progress. I have a couple of dialogs that worked with the CVS version from
November, but I need to rewrite them to some extent to work with the current
version.
Kalle
--
Matthias Kalle Dalheimer
President & CEO/VD
Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB
Fax +46-563-540028
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
