Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 14-Mar-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | | > And what about the other changes I see, like | > - if (line != "</cell>") { | > + if (!prefixIs(line, "</cell>")) { | | > Should they be applied too? | | Sorry Jean-Marc I forgot about them, YES the </xxx> should also be changed | to check only the prefix because with getline as we have it now its | </cell>\r instead of </cell>. Otherwise we could strip trailing \r in | l_getline which may be the better solution. What do you think? We should strip it. Lgb
- Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!? Allan Rae
- Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!? Kayvan A. Sylvan
- Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!? Herbert Voss
- Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!? Claus Hentschel
- Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!? Juergen Vigna
- RE: What's wrong with the new Tables!? Juergen Vigna
- Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!? Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!? Juergen Vigna
- Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!? Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!? Juergen Vigna
- Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!? Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!? Allan Rae
- Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!? Kayvan A. Sylvan
- Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!? Allan Rae