On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 05:34:32PM +0000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 10/05/2018 à 19:29, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 05:25:22PM +0000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > > > I see it now. Not sure what to do about it, though. > > > > No problem, thanks for taking a look. I doubt it bothers anyone else. I > > was thinking we might already have a mechanism for delaying the screen > > refresh in such cases. > > We have setBusy (true/false), but I do not know what would be the > consequence of setting it around a command-sequence call. You could try > that, but I fear that the sequence will not be able to call interactive > calls like file-open anymore.
You mean that if we add it to every command-sequence all we will run into problems. But for this particular call it should work? If so, would it be worth it to add an option to LFUN_COMMAND_SEQUENCE so that it could be called with or without? Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
