Am Mittwoch, den 03.01.2018, 09:05 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > Am Dienstag, den 02.01.2018, 20:32 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc > Lasgouttes: > > Le 02/01/2018 à 18:02, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : > > > Am Dienstag, den 02.01.2018, 17:07 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc > > > Lasgouttes: > > > > The way I read Scott's message was that it would make sense to > > > > rely > > > > on > > > > the getStatus of LFUN_ENVIRONMENT_SPLIT to know when it needs > > > > to > > > > appear. > > > > I see now that the two logics are different. Can you elaborate > > > > on > > > > what > > > > the difference is? > > > > > > "Do not show me in the menu" vs. "deactivate me". > > > > These are the same when using OptItem :) > > No, I meant that the lfun itself is still functional (when using the > minibuffer). It does not do very useful things, but it is usable. > Thus > I don't want to completely disable it. I do not consider it useful > enough to display it in the menu, though.
I reconsidered and decided to disable the function in the given case. It's really not useful. Alas, it was not as straightforward as I though since the optional version of add() cannot handle command-sequences. Jürgen > > Jürgen >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
