On 10/04/2017 05:37 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 04/10/17 à 20:09, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : >> Sorry. I didn't notice that you were talking about 2.2.x. Yes, you are >> probably right. >> >> Richard, is the attached patch Ok? > > Actually, the patch does not change my situation. It seems that this > ancient gcc does not know about __thread. > > However, I just discovered that I also have clang++, which is a > different beast, and which does compile Paragraph.o without error. > Unfortunately I did not have the time to finish the compilation. > > More on that tomorrow.
I know absolutely nothing about this topic, so my view is: It's fine for 2.2.x when all of the people contributing to this thread are happy with it. Richard
