On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 03:06:57AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 02:14:39PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 07:14:07AM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote: > > > > > > But besides that I agree with your suggestions. Thanks again for > > > spending your time looking into this issue with so much care. > > > > Yes, it seems that Scott can be easily convinced by your constructed > > arguments. > > > > "There is a bomb under our table, but we cannot remove it because it has > > been there since 2011." > > I think the situation is more like the following: > > There is a bomb under the table. We could put another similar bomb or > not put another similar bomb. Your argument is that if we don't put > another bomb well we should remove the first bomb also.
Actually, my argument would be highlighting the application of double standards in judgements. -- Enrico
