On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 10:57:02PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 16/07/2017 à 22:48, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > > > Agreed. OTOH, I do not want to have support for minted that require to > > > hardcode stuff outside of the Listings inset. > > > > This is a false problem. For me, minted support could stay as it is now. > > Who needs it can read the fine manual and take all the necessary actions > > to exploit the support offered by LyX. > > As it stands now, minted support is not dangerous at all. > > I think it should offer the same needauth mechanism than sweave and friends, > but not hard coded in the latest patch you posted (or at least the last I > saw).
Look, some people doesn't want to use listings and prefer minted. External templates and modules for using minted have been proposed. Thus, minted is used and people know how to deal with it. Now they don't have to use ERT or strange tricks. So, what is the problem? > > > Enrico, in general I try not to disagree with you, not because I am scared > > > of retaliation (but of course, you scare me to some extent :), > > > > Funny, I could use the same argument :) > > Really? I did not know I had this ability. Yes, you scared me several times in the past. > > I don't know why, but I think that comments like this are not going to > > help either. > > If you say so, then you are right. I just had to try something instead of > pretending like everybody else that nothing is happening. Yes, I think that we miss a charismatic figure which is able to smooth over difficulties. But in your last sentence you were essentially saying that I was wrong. That is a respectable opinion of yours, of course, but I hope you understand that it is not going to help. -- Enrico
