On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 06:28:45PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 04:15:39PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 12:48:23AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> > > On 08/31/2016 05:28 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:08:35PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Sounds good to me
> > > >> (and if there are caveats I am not aware of regarding
> > > >> exceptions in LyX, I would be curious to know)
> > > > I have occassionally seen comments that suggest exceptions should be 
> > > > avoided, for example here [1].
> > > 
> > > Sometimes people overdo it, and there have been discussions about that.
> > > But I'm pretty sure that escaping from a deeply nested series of calls
> > > is a good use. This may even be convered in Exceptional C++.
> > 
> > OK good to know.
> 
> Patch is attached. If no comments, I'll commit in a couple of days.

I decided to just commit it. It is a simple patch and I think it's what
others had in mind. Please let me know if you have any thoughts.

Scott

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to