On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 06:28:45PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 04:15:39PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 12:48:23AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > > On 08/31/2016 05:28 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:08:35PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > > > > > > >> Sounds good to me > > > >> (and if there are caveats I am not aware of regarding > > > >> exceptions in LyX, I would be curious to know) > > > > I have occassionally seen comments that suggest exceptions should be > > > > avoided, for example here [1]. > > > > > > Sometimes people overdo it, and there have been discussions about that. > > > But I'm pretty sure that escaping from a deeply nested series of calls > > > is a good use. This may even be convered in Exceptional C++. > > > > OK good to know. > > Patch is attached. If no comments, I'll commit in a couple of days.
I decided to just commit it. It is a simple patch and I think it's what others had in mind. Please let me know if you have any thoughts. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature