Le 30/08/2016 à 16:55, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
OK I pushed at 03684ae0. I wonder if the misunderstanding comes back to
what we agreed on before, which is that it is weird that both
buffer-zoom-in 4
buffer-zoom-out 4
have the same behavior.
No, it probably come from my laziness about reading your patch :)
Perhaps we should change this so that
buffer-zoom-in 4
buffer-zoom-out -4
have the same behavior instead. But I don't feel like working on that
now. And the patch I committed at least makes things consistent given
the current behavior.
Yes the arguments should be changed one day, but I suspect that nobody
uses the lfuns with an argument anyway...
JMarc
