On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 04:41:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 30/08/2016 à 16:36, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > It would go down to 10%, both with my patch and without it. > > It is OK, then. > > Do what you think is best.
OK I pushed at 03684ae0. I wonder if the misunderstanding comes back to what we agreed on before, which is that it is weird that both buffer-zoom-in 4 buffer-zoom-out 4 have the same behavior. Perhaps we should change this so that buffer-zoom-in 4 buffer-zoom-out -4 have the same behavior instead. But I don't feel like working on that now. And the patch I committed at least makes things consistent given the current behavior. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
