On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:04:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 07/03/2016 18:26, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >>Does this patch fix the problem for you? I had to add explicit tests for > >>some inset codes, but that will be OK for now. The problem is that we allow > >>putting the cursor on the row preceding display math, but not after a > >>newline inset. I plan to rewrite part of this code in 2.3 anyway. > > > >No, I do not see any change in behavior. I do not think this is a big > >regression (unless you do), so if you prefer to wait for 2.2.x or 2.3 > >that's fine with me. Your call. > > I fixed the wrong bug. The one I fixed is that when one clicks to the right > of the newline character (after inserting it), the cursor is placed to the > right of the newline, instead of before the newline, as 2.1 would do. I > think this is worth fixing anyway.
Makes sense and since I didn't notice any change in other behavior, if you think it's ready to go in please commit. > >My offer to try to bisect still holds if that would help. > > Yes, if it is not too burdensome. It appears that the bug only occurs if the > paragraph is in an itemize sequence but is not the first one. This does not > look like any code I touched. Git bisect lead me to f29e7803. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
