Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 21/01/2016 15:42, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >> >> Sigh. Now that I can test it with an older compiler (gcc 4.6, Ubuntu >> 12.04) I find that it does not compile in C++98 mode because of >> boost::next/prior. This has been fixed already in master, so I >> cherry-picked the commits (see attached). > > So what shall I do with this patch? In my view it improves the > situation. The only reason for not pushing it would be if we revert the > boost update patch.
I did not reply since the original code is from me, so I am obviously biased, but IMO this would be safe enough to apply. Georg
