Am Montag, 11. Januar 2016 um 21:08:17, schrieb Georg Baum <georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de> > Guenter Milde wrote: > > > In normal inter-release development times, I think it is too restricting > > to insist on tested regression-free patches. > > I can only recommend to try to always work like that. I know it does not > sound convincing (you really have to try it out), but I made the experience > that I get stuff done quicker if I take the tests into account as soon as I > think imy change might work (which it usually does not do, and the tests do > usually show where it is broken). > > > IMO, a sane state of the test suite can also be maintained without > > stifling work on the code if the test suite is cleaned up in a couple of > > days whenever new test failures are noticed. > > True, but in total it will be even less work if coce and test changes are > submitted in one go. > > > Georg
+1 to both statements.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
