On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 11:06:04PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Guillaume Munch wrote:
> > Also, because it took me a while to > > figure out where the bind and ui format was defined. Nothing was > > documented. (Is there a maintainer for Development.lyx who will validate > > the CT'd changes?) > > There is no maintainer for Development.lyx. Because of that and since it is > not supposed to be translated you don't need CT for this document IMHO. +1. If you are just documenting something, go ahead. If you are proposing a rule that LyX developers should follow, then this should be discussed on the list but once there is agreement just commit (as Georg says, no CT needed). Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature