Am Sonntag, 3. Januar 2016 um 10:59:20, schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 03:26:19PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Samstag, 2. Januar 2016 um 22:21:21, schrieb Kornel Benko > > <kor...@lyx.org> > > > Am Samstag, 2. Januar 2016 um 11:31:02, schrieb Kornel Benko > > > <kor...@lyx.org> > > > > Am Samstag, 2. Januar 2016 um 04:07:57, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > <skost...@lyx.org> > > > > > On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 08:08:12AM +0000, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > > > > > > Le 02/01/2016 01:31, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > > > > > >On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 07:07:16PM +0000, Jean-Pierre Chrétien > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Then, it seems that the last reference ([9] to the checklist.html > > > > > > >>file on > > > > > > >>the NIST web site) is dead. It reads now : > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP811/sec11.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Just checked and works well for me. Does it work now for you? > > > > > > > > > > > > No, > > > > > > > > > > > > http://physics.nist.gov/Document/checklist.pdf > > > > > > > > > > > > gives an "Error 404" page. Maybe you have it in your cache ? > > > > > > > > > > I see what you mean now. I confirm that the link is broken. We have > > > > > tests to catch broken links, and we correctly detect this link to > > > > > test, > > > > > but for some reason it passes the test. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for reporting this. It would be nice to find the correct link > > > > > and > > > > > change the docs before release. > > > > > > > > > > Kornel, do you have an idea for why this test passes? What do you > > > > > think > > > > > about checking for the string "404" in the title of the html page? > > > > > > > > Until now we did not interpret the data. > > > > This is, what we get (first lines): > > > > <html> > > > > <head> > > > > <title>Error 404</title> > > > > <script language="JavaScript" id="_fed_an_js_tag" > > > > src="/js/federated > > > > analytics.all.min.js?agency=NIST&subagency=pml&pua=UA-37115410-46&yt=true"></script> > > > > </head> > > > > > > > > So yes, we can interpret the string. > > > > > > > > commit 4b49a59 > > > > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > It turned out, that there are more broken url's. > > > We have to check for the string '404 Not Found' in title block. > > > Also there may be more title blocks involved. > > > > Now we have even more broken URLs. > > > > I changed the check for valid url from low-level Net::HTTP to more > > sophisticated > > LWP::UserAgent. > > *Rechecked* all found broken urls with firefox. > > Some of them required login and registration, they share now own non-tested > > group, > > collected in file 'knownToRegisterURLS'. > > The problematic cases are where the page provided by the html server is > > some default 'Not Found' page. > > > > 22 wrong urls. > > I guess this is "good" news. Thanks for improving the check.
Hm, yes. Now the search for alternative urls should start. It would be nice if
someone could help.
> Scott
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
