I agree with you actually. My points were probably: * we should get rid of the few users of boost::noncopyable * ot would be better to use the terse style of comments we use elsewhere.
JMarc Le 14 novembre 2014 18:48:34 CET, Georg Baum <georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de> a écrit : >Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> Le 11/11/2014 20:58, Georg Baum a écrit : >>> commit 8f93600d3fa8182ba43973075cf37e7ecb2be8d3 >>> Author: Georg Baum <b...@lyx.org> >>> Date: Tue Nov 11 07:22:14 2014 +0100 >>> >>> Prevent accidental usage of wrong copy constructor >> >> Is this what we use boost:noncopyable for in some places? It would be >> nice to keep the same form in all these places. > >This used to be boost::noncopyable a long time ago, but IIRC this is >now >considered evil, because it pulls in a header just for very little >benefit. > >Please correct me if I am wrong, I'll change this if that is the case. > > > >Georg
