On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: >> > The original idea about this file was to primarily have list of languages >> > which need to have ack in case some new face appears on the list (so I can >> > quickly check and ask him before he disappear as often happens). >> >> OK a complete new language is indeed more important. >> >> > So to me keeping list of unreviewed languages for 2.0 and visibly >> > untranslated four new entries in 2.1 is more than enough. I don't have >> > strong opinion about it so we can put your list back if you insists, but >> > given than I'm already most obsessive person in our team when it comes to >> > pushing random users and translators to check this file I wonder who is >> > going to read through the database you started to create. >> >> I think we should at least try, since the work for the individual translator >> is not much: He only needs to look at one language. If nobody answers - OK, >> then we can't help and we are done. > > Feel free to add your database back ;) > Pavel
Georg, It's up to you to do what is best from your point of view. I can say I have received explicit reviews for: Polish, Slovak, Dutch. Also, I think we can assume an implicit positive review for German, Czech, and Italian. Jean-Piere is explicily working on the French one as he is asking detailed questions about specific strings. I just asked the nynorsk translator. Vincent
