Am 01.04.2014 11:26, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Indeed Farsi is handled. But what I do not know is what characters have to be handled specially.
> But indeed it should not be too difficult to add support for Urdu in 2.1.x timeframe by adding
> some code similar to what is done in Arabic. But do we want to to that? And
who would be our
> local expert?
My proposal after reading today's posts: I commit my language file patch (to 2.1.-staging or master
as Vincent decides) to give jamil a version with wich he can start to work. I will now also
encourage Jamil to help us and tell what special ligatures are in Urdu and to test JMarc's work?
OK?
regards Uwe
