On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Georg Baum <georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > stefano franchi wrote: > >> Thanks Wilfried, this is great. > > Yes, I also think that is is a good mixture of stuff to test. > >> I tried importing the latex files into LyX (2.0.7) and compiling to >> pdf and everything seems ok. However, there are a few spots in the >> imported LyX in which Latex code comes over untranslated. Could you, >> or anyone else with a better understanding of LaTeX math, tell me if >> the same effect can be reproduced with LyX only commands (i.e if the >> Latex code is just a failure of the tex2lyx converter or if Latex is >> using features not currently available in LyX)? > > I had a quick look, and I did not find any tex2lyx problem. LyX does not > support \verb (this occurs a lot), and LyX mathed does neither support \hbox > nor \notag. Unless I overlooked something the result is as good as it can > get. > >
Wilfried, Georg, should the test be a simple union of the two documents? Or is eqn2.tex simply using the same features (or possibly a subset) of eqn.tex? Sorry for the silly question, but it is difficult to judge the complexity and kind of Latex Math constructs when you do not have daily practice with them. Stefano -- __________________________________________________ Stefano Franchi Associate Research Professor Department of Hispanic Studies Ph: +1 (979) 845-2125 Texas A&M University Fax: +1 (979) 845-6421 College Station, Texas, USA stef...@tamu.edu http://stefano.cleinias.org
