On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 4:21 AM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > Am Samstag, 3. August 2013 um 17:05:48, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > <skost...@lyx.org> > >> >> I don't agree with the name "revertedTests" (and likewise the variable > >> >> names). Using as a reverence > >> >> http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/revert > >> >> I think that you are intending to use it with the following meaning: > >> >> "(transitive, now rare) To turn back, or turn to the contrary; to > >> >> reverse." > > Yes. > >> >> As noted, this definition is rare. > >> >> I think most people running the tests will think of git (in fact, git > >> >> is mentioned on the wiktionary page) or of this definition: > >> >> "To cause to return to a former condition." > >> >> > >> >> Do you prefer "revert" to "invert"? > > > > Of course, if this meaning is rare, I will not prefer it anymore. > > What I meant was: > > Show that the named tests are not correct in some way, but that we > > hope they will be OK some day. > > In (my) other words: reverted for now.
I see. I can't think of a short way to explain this. > For me "invertedTests" looks more like we intend let them be forever. Good point. I didn't think about this. > But I am not hanging on 'revert'. > > I knew, *this* will be the hard part. Indeed. Here's another idea: INV-TEST_SEE-README.ctest_export/doc/attic/DocStyle_pdf I don't care about the "INV_TEST" part. That can be any keyword. The point is that if someone wants to know what the keyword means it's clear to look in README.ctest (or wherever). Scott
