Am Montag, 8. Juli 2013 um 14:49:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 7. Juli 2013 um 16:14:27, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > <skost...@lyx.org> > > > > Maybe, the gcc-option '-fvisibility=visible" could help. > How do I specify this in the CMakeLists.txt file?
add_definitions("-fvisibility=visible")
should do.
>
> > Looks like /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXmu.so.6 were invalid.
> >
> > Can you check, e.g. with "nm", "file", etc?
>
> $ file /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXmu.so.6
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXmu.so.6: symbolic link to `libXmu.so.6.2.0'
> $ file -L /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXmu.so.6
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXmu.so.6: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object,
> x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked,
> BuildID[sha1]=0x7f2d93949a1cc4793245fd4b8b65b227184e0407, stripped
> $ nm /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXmu.so.6
> nm: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXmu.so.6: no symbols
> $
>
> I reinstalled libxmu6 but that did not help (and also I've reproduced
> this on two independent installation).
>
> The strange thing is that if I build it directly by running (as the
> instructions say):
> xmkmf
> make
You mean libxmu6 built with xmkmf?
>
> Then it builds without error. Is the difference necessarily different flags?
No clue, this is confusing. Could you elaborate the flag differences
> Scott
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
