Il 16/05/2013 10:43, Liviu Andronic ha scritto:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Gioele Barabucci <gio...@svario.it> wrote:
Il 15/05/2013 19:43, Richard Heck ha scritto:
On 05/15/2013 01:36 PM, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
* a common `acmsigs.inc` file with all the stiles;
* a layout specific to the normal, strict style `acm_proc_article-sp`;
* a layout specific to the tighter, alternate style `sig-alternate`.
If I'm reading these correctly, the layout files are identical, in effect?
Yes, they are, just different classes in `\DeclareLaTeXClass`.
If the layout definitions are identical, wouldn't it be better to have
an acmlayouts.inc file that provides the definitions, and include that
in the 3 individual layout files that use different
`\DeclareLaTeXClass`?
Aren't you describing exactly what happens in the files I sent?
The `acmsigs.inc` contains all the styles, the other two layout files
just provide a `\DeclareLaTeXClass` and perform a `Input acmsigs.inc`.
Bye,
--
Gioele Barabucci <gio...@svario.it>
