On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Gioele Barabucci <gio...@svario.it> wrote: > Il 15/05/2013 19:43, Richard Heck ha scritto: >> >> On 05/15/2013 01:36 PM, Gioele Barabucci wrote: >>> >>> * a common `acmsigs.inc` file with all the stiles; >>> * a layout specific to the normal, strict style `acm_proc_article-sp`; >>> * a layout specific to the tighter, alternate style `sig-alternate`. >> >> >> If I'm reading these correctly, the layout files are identical, in effect? > > > Yes, they are, just different classes in `\DeclareLaTeXClass`. > If the layout definitions are identical, wouldn't it be better to have an acmlayouts.inc file that provides the definitions, and include that in the 3 individual layout files that use different `\DeclareLaTeXClass`?
Liviu PS If we want to include them in trunk, best to do this quickly before the 2.1 freeze is announced, so as to avoid any (lengthy) discussions afterwards regarding fileformat changes.
