Am 15.01.2013 22:24, schrieb Georg Baum:
IMHO, IEEEtran.cls does not support Uwe's reasoning at all, but rather the oppsosite. And I'd really like to see _one_ example of an updated journal/conference .cls file that broke an officially supported LyX .layout file (and no, unless somebody presents at least one incompatible change of the ACM classes that started this thread I won't believe that the new versions are backward incompatible: I only saw new commands, not changed or deleted old ones).
That is what I always stated, non of my changes (except of that nasty modernCV beast) break the backward-compatibility in the strict sense but they introduce new commands and that is what this thread is about.
I now understood what you all basically want. Although that I am not a fan of the versioning, if a majority favors this, we do it. But I want to know how _exactly_ the preferred model works. What layout version is rename to what?
regards Uwe
