Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > The problem is that somethings that I find highly non-controversial are > not thought so by others.
If this is the problem, you can always go through the usual route "if no one objects I'll commit this later". > (Basically TR1 is dead and is often incompatible with C++11. Boost > almost always changes to be compatible with C++11). Correct me if I don't remember right, but TR1 (and conversion to standard once settled) was just excursion how far can we get while ditching boost, no? IIRC we were immediately hit by MSVC errors and the rest of TR1 ifdefs are zombies of this track in the code. BTW after some decade we still include boost in our tarballs and maintain its updates. What was the original reason and is it still needed? Some distributions disable internal boost and we do not see any flood of bug reports. Pavel
