Le 26/10/2012 11:05, Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
| Pavel, Vincent, this is probably the moment where you should weigh in
| the discussion.
I'd really that you though about how to solve the "using namespace std"
debacle, and the ugly workarounds you have to counter measure the
namespace pollution you get because of it. Also how that affects TR1 vs.
C++11 vs. boost incompabilities.
(Basically TR1 is dead and is often incompatible with C++11. Boost
almost always changes to be compatible with C++11).
I agree that we remove tr1 support, which was just funny at the time.
Is our current boost new enough to be compatible with c++11?
I propose that the using namespace question is handled as a consequence
of what happens when we do that.
But then, I am not going to do it, so I can propose whatever I want.
JMarc
