On 21.11.2011 08:28, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 20.11.2011 um 23:16 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
Stephan Witt<st.w...@gmx.net> writes:
| Am 08.11.2011 um 22:40 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
On 08/11/2011 22:10, Peter Kümmel wrote:
On 08.11.2011 22:07, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Op 8-11-2011 22:03, Peter Kümmel schreef:
On 08.11.2011 21:59, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Op 8-11-2011 21:48, Peter Kümmel schreef:
Is it still necessary to disable the reply function for this list?
Most people are now used to press "reply all" which only
produces unneeded duplicates.
Peter
I don't understand what the problem is of "reply all".
I got your email twice, that's the problem.
You can do something about it yourself.
I don't understand. How could I prevent you to send me a private email?
By using a bit more intelligent mail program :-)
| I have to edit most of the to addresses of my replies and my reply to field
too.
| AFAICS, only Pavel is one of the rare people sending mails with the
| "correct" reply to.
Actaully I would argue that he, and you. are the ones doing it wrong.
Wrong? Why?
I understand that it's not wise to force everybody to reply-to list.
But if I decide to get the reply only once and get it from the list...
what's wrong with sending my 2cent emails to list and set the reply-to
to the list address too? Do you mean it's too much manual work?
BTW, not everybody has the opportunity or is in the mood to use procmail.
I cannot believe that you don't know that.
"oh lord won't you buy me a mercedes benz"
Stephan
