Am Sonntag, 20. November 2011 um 19:01:09, schrieb Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org>
> Am Sonntag, 20. November 2011 um 11:29:29, schrieb Richard Heck 
> <rgh...@comcast.net>
> > 
> > 3) As Vincent essentially noted, it's anyway wrong to clone all the
> > children, etc, when we are just doing autosave. The attached patch
> > addresses that issue. So with it, we won't see the assertion that Kornel
> > reported. My worry here is that this patch seems intrusive, and it's
> > kind of late in the day to commit it to 2.0.2. Longer term, though, we
> > definitely want this patch.
> > 
> > Overall, then, (1) looks safest for 2.0.2, so long as my concerns about
> > it are misplaced. If not, then I guess we should go with (2), for 2.0.2,
> > since the crash I described is extremely unlikely ever to happen. For
> > trunk, we should certainly do (3) and commit the same patch to 2.0.3svn
> > as soon as it is open. That would allow for the option of going back to
> > the global variable as we have it now, for the reasons mentioned.
> > 
> > Comments?
> 
> I applied the patch. The crash is gone, *but* I cannot observe autosave 
> anymore.
> 
> So, there may be something not ok.
> 
>       Kornel

Sorry, was too fast. The lyx-debug output was printed without flush(). I see 
autosave now.

And still no crash. I for one would like to have it in trunk.

        Kornel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to