Am Sonntag, 20. November 2011 um 11:29:29, schrieb Richard Heck <rgh...@comcast.net> > > 3) As Vincent essentially noted, it's anyway wrong to clone all the > children, etc, when we are just doing autosave. The attached patch > addresses that issue. So with it, we won't see the assertion that Kornel > reported. My worry here is that this patch seems intrusive, and it's > kind of late in the day to commit it to 2.0.2. Longer term, though, we > definitely want this patch. > > Overall, then, (1) looks safest for 2.0.2, so long as my concerns about > it are misplaced. If not, then I guess we should go with (2), for 2.0.2, > since the crash I described is extremely unlikely ever to happen. For > trunk, we should certainly do (3) and commit the same patch to 2.0.3svn > as soon as it is open. That would allow for the option of going back to > the global variable as we have it now, for the reasons mentioned. > > Comments?
I applied the patch. The crash is gone, *but* I cannot observe autosave anymore.
So, there may be something not ok.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
