On 06/16/2011 11:51 AM, Julien Rioux wrote: > > Since layout2layout missed those, I wonder if something has to be done > there? Unless the user changes their own layouts manually, they could > be left with broken layouts, right? > Partially broken, yes. I've thought about this, though, and it's very difficult to get all the cases right. There's some additional checking that could be done, probably. This is partially addressed in the release notes.
Richard
