Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> It seems to me that zh_TW is "more" correct for traditional Chinese, >> although it seems to be more a convention than strictly conforming >> (since TW and CN are not country codes). > > The official tags seem to be zh-Hant (traditional Chinese) and zh-Hans > (simplified Chinese).
Thanks for the explanation. Meanwhile I have added special code to cover the current situation. Anything that does not make this special code useless is no improvement. Changing the .po files is no good idea IMHO, since I see zh_CN and zh_TW in my system, but neither zh_Hans nor zh_Hant. Since the code in lib/languages is currently unused I will change it to zh_TW for consistency reasons. Georg
