Am 14.03.2011 um 07:59 schrieb Stephan Witt:

> Am 13.03.2011 um 22:25 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
> 
>> Op 13-3-2011 22:20, Tommaso Cucinotta schreef:
>>> Il 13/03/2011 21:46, Vincent van Ravesteijn ha scritto:
>>>> A backtrace would be more useful :S..
>>> I know, sorry, but I reduced the problem to a simple test-case:
>>> 
>>> 1. C-n (new document)
>>> 2. a b
>>> 3. [Shift+Left][Shift-left] (select the " b" part, including the leading 
>>> space)
>>> 4. [Space]
>>> 
>>> #2  0x000000000063027c in __replacement_assert (this=0x1a053c8, __pos=2) at 
>>> /usr/include/c++/4.4/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/c++config.h:284
>>> #3  std::basic_string<wchar_t, std::char_traits<wchar_t>, 
>>> std::allocator<wchar_t> >::operator[] (this=0x1a053c8, __pos=2) at 
>>> /usr/include/c++/4.4/bits/basic_string.h:743
>>> #4  0x000000000061a372 in lyx::Paragraph::isWordSeparator (this=0x1a203e0, 
>>> pos=2) at Paragraph.cpp:2852
>>> #5  0x000000000061a4fc in lyx::Paragraph::locateWord (this=0x1a203e0, 
>>> from=@0x7fffffff5ad0, to=@0x7fffffff5ad8, loc=4294967295) at 
>>> Paragraph.cpp:3441
>>> #6  0x00000000005300a0 in lyx::DocIterator::locateWord (this=<value 
>>> optimized out>, loc=lyx::WHOLE_WORD) at DocIterator.cpp:201
>>> #7  0x0000000000718e5c in lyx::Cursor::checkNewWordPosition 
>>> (this=0x1a2cd68) at Cursor.cpp:563
>>> #8  0x0000000000719046 in lyx::Cursor::resetAnchor (this=0x1a2cd68) at 
>>> Cursor.cpp:506
>>> #9  0x00000000007190c4 in lyx::Cursor::clearSelection (this=0x168f) at 
>>> Cursor.cpp:1157
>>> #10 0x000000000072b72f in lyx::cap::cutSelection (cur=..., doclear=<value 
>>> optimized out>, realcut=<value optimized out>) at CutAndPaste.cpp:786
>> 
>> Can you check whether this is fixed by r37899 ? If not, can you try to 
>> revert to r37462. Maybe it's also a regression introduced in r37463.
> 
> I don't think r37462 is related.
> 
> The LyX checkout r37923 (of course including r37899) does not crash with your 
> simple test-case.

Hmm... now I've tried it on Linux and get the crash.
I don't know the difference to Mac - but now I have a chance to find it myself.

Stephan

Reply via email to