On 09/23/2010 01:16 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> A few questions, though. First, isn't there another way to do this in
> the koma-script classes?
Yes, KOMA-script provides the same behavior as \lhead/\rhead using
commands with another name.
> If so, then perhaps we should provide for that functionality, as
> well. I have ideas about how to do so if necessary.
What are your ideas?
I propose to add support for the KOMA-script header/footer commands in
the scr layout file so that KOMA-script users don't have to use the
special module.
That sounds like the right approach. If so, then I think---I'll have to
check, though---that the right thing to do (my other ideas were more
complicated...much) is just to use a ProvidesModule declaration, which
should prevent this one from being loaded. I should make sure it does
that....
Richard
