On 06/29/2010 08:05 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 06/29/2010 01:46 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
One could argue that it allows the kind of code that's conceptionally
closest to the model Rob has in mind to compile out-of-the-box, but
does qvector provide something special compared to std::vector?
QVector doesn't require a default constructor.
Two solution here to stay with vector:
1) give TocItem a default constructor
It has one:
class TocItem
{
friend class Toc;
friend class TocBackend;
public:
/// Default constructor for STL containers.
TocItem() : dit_(0) {}
2) use vector<TocItem *> instead.
I think he really does mean:
vector<TocItem> *
But I'm not absolutely sure about that.
rh
