Tommaso Cucinotta <tomm...@lyx.org> writes: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> Would the attached patch make sense to both of you? >>> > I had worked to a smaller patch concerning only regexp, in which I had > introduced a REGEXP_CODE, and was using such code in insetAllowed(), > and I could see regexp insets inside ERTs and URLs. Probably I can > rebase that on your patch, which seems to address also the other LFUN > handling issues pointed out by vfr.
I committed my patch. JMarc
