Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Would the attached patch make sense to both of you?
I had worked to a smaller patch concerning only regexp, in which I had introduced a REGEXP_CODE, and was using such code in insetAllowed(), and I could see regexp insets inside ERTs and URLs. Probably I can rebase that on your patch, which seems to address also the other LFUN handling issues pointed out by vfr.

   T.

Reply via email to