On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Lior Silberman wrote: > I know this _feels_ bad, but I think the most efficient implementation > will be to handle the temporary ourselves: > > Menu* Menu::expand (Buffer* buf) > { > Menu *resulting_menu = new Menu(); > ... > // add stuff to the new menu > ... > return resulting_menu; > } > > Which can be used as: > > Menu *tmp = menu.expand(); > ... > ... > delete tmp; At least if we go this way we should use auto_ptr<Menu> as in: { auto_ptr<Menu> tmp( menu.expand() ); ... ... } This is also better since we reduce the risk of exceptions and/or returns before the delete. -- Baruch Even http://techst02.technion.ac.il/~sbaruch/ (My Site) http://www.redrival.com/jindor/ (My brothers AD&D site) " Learn to laugh ... it's the path to true love! " - The Angel in the movie Michael
- Re: Basic C++ question Angus Leeming
- Re: Basic C++ question Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Basic C++ question Angus Leeming
- Re: Basic C++ question Baruch Even
- Re: Basic C++ question Andre Poenitz
- Re: Basic C++ question Andre Poenitz
- Re: Basic C++ question Baruch Even
- Re: Basic C++ question Angus Leeming
- Re: Basic C++ question Baruch Even
- Re: Basic C++ question Lior Silberman
- Re: Basic C++ question Baruch Even
- Re: Basic C++ question Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Basic C++ question Lior Silberman
- Re: Basic C++ question Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Basic C++ question Dekel Tsur
- Re: Basic C++ question Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Basic C++ question Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Basic C++ question Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Basic C++ question Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Basic C++ question Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Basic C++ question Juergen Vigna