Jürgen Spitzmüller <sp...@lyx.org> writes:
> I thought about this, but I think this is more error prone. Think
> someone uses the language code for something and is not aware of the
> variety (which is by no means standard, as opposed to the language
> tags, but only aspell convention, AFAICS).
OK then.
> In theory yes ("Schluß" vs. "Schluss"). But I do not think anyone will set up
> a po file for old spelling. This would be purely cosmetic[1], whereas a spell
> checker that fails to check old spelling passages is really, really annoying.
I do not know what is the gettext convention for that. We'll wait until
someone requests it...
JMarc
